Team Vision for Problem Definition Phase


Project Summary

Electric longboards have been around for almost decades at this point but current models suffer from numerous limitations and flaws that make them unappealing to the vast majority of potential consumers. Most have unnecessarily long ranges, being capable of going 10, 15, 20, or even more miles on a single charge even though that’s substantially in excess of what is needed for common use cases. This focus on a large range leads to correspondingly large batteries, significantly increasing the weight of an electric longboard to the detriment of portability, which is further impaired by the inherent length of a longboard. Current models of electric longboards are also controlled via a handheld remote, which is prone to loss or failure and makes braking and accelerating in a controlled manner difficult due to the lack of granularity and feedback. Additionally, the current steering mechanisms in electric longboards, the kingpin, exacerbate the control issues by rendering electric longboards unstable at high speeds.

The goal of this project is to design an electronically powered longboard that would be desirable to a significantly larger market than the current designs and which has a futuristic look to it that invokes feelings of freedom in the end-user. The focus would be on portability and ease of use, being collapsible such that it could fit inside of the average backpack, while being lightweight, and having a setup time of seconds. The prototype would have a max speed of at least 25 MPH and stability over the entire range of possible speeds. Further, it would incorporate a braking system, preferably regenerative, and be entirely hands-free with a control system that is integral to the longboard and manipulated via weight-shifting and foot placement.

Use Cases



Project Goals and Key Deliverables

The focus of this project is to deliver a fully functional electric longboard prototype by December of 2019. This longboard should be collapsible, stable, quick to assemble, and hands-free controlled with a minor emphasis on waterproofing and general weight reduction. This functioning prototype is the project's main deliverable, however this project is also responsible for completing a submission to Michelin's 2019 Mobility competition by March 1st. For this competition a general design with preliminary sketches and renderings needs to be submitted in a effort to show how this concept meets the criteria of Michelin's design challenge. For 2019 Michelin challenges students to envision what freedom inspiring urban transportation in the year 2035 will look like. Our design goals for this longboard incorporate feature combinations that are novel making our prototype and concept well suited for this design competition. 

Interview Information

Table 1: Interview Documentation Table

DateIntervieweeInterview Documentation
01/24/2019Dr. Michael SchrlauCustomer Interview 01/24/2019

Stakeholders

Table 2: List of Stakeholders

StakeholderPosition
Dr. Michael SchrlauCustomer
MSD Design TeamEngineers and Designers
Boosted, Evolve, Etc.

Major Electric Longboard Manufacturers

Donald Pophal

Guide

Customer Requirements

Table 3: Customer Requirements Table

Customer Requirements
CategoryCR #Customer RequirementRank (9/3/1)DescriptionComment/Status
Consumer Oriented Criteria1Compactibility/Ease of Use9Longboard must fit in an average sized backpack. Set-up/Storage Conversion times must be short, transition between collapsed and expanded state must be simple and without opportunity for user error.
Consumer Oriented Criteria2Stability/Safety9Longboard must allow rider to have a safe and smooth riding experience. Rider must not feel longboard is rickety or that the experience of the ride is turbulent, rough, or unpredictable.
Engineering Oriented Criteria3Hands Free9Rider must be able to operate longboards electric motor and breaks hands free.
Engineering Oriented Criteria4Braking System9Longboard must include a functional braking system.
Engineering Oriented Criteria5Electric Motor9Longboard must include a functional electric motor.
Engineering Oriented Criteria6Adjustable Speed3Longboard must have adjustable high/low speeds that user can control hands free.
Engineering Oriented Criteria7Waterproof3Longboard must withstand weather conditions such as rain and snow.
Consumer Oriented Criteria8Lightweight1Longboard should not be burdensome to user while carrying during transit.

Link to the live document here.

Engineering Requirements (Metrics & Specifications)

Table 4. Engineering Requirements 








 

Benchmarking

 

Table 5. Benchmarks


House of Quality

Table 6: House of Quality 


Risk Assessment

Table 7: Risk Assessment Table

Risk CategoryRiskCauseEffectRisk PreventionContingency PlanLikelihoodSeverityImportanceOwner(s)
TechnicalFailure of Force SensorsDamage to sensing surface or blocked transmission of force to sensing surfaceComplete loss of motor control/unexpected motor responseThoroughly test force sensor installationUse remote to control motors3927Matthew G.
TechnicalControl system causing unexpected outputs (malfunction)Incorrect inputs were put in the systemIncorrect Outputs/System FailureHave at least one other team member monitoring the inputs made to the systemHave a micro-controller system expert look over the system199Matthew G.
TechnicalElectronic components protectionExposure to external environmental factors (water,rocks, etc.)Damage to the battery and other componentsEnsure proper location and protection of electrical components.Have a guide for a particular environment that must133Kristin O.
TechnicalProduct failure or part malfunctionsMiscalculations during design processA non-functioning productMechanical Design Leads must be consulting each otherConsult with Mechanical Engineering Professor.3927Tanvir M. Connor F. Erik L.
SafetyPinch points in the mechanismFolding MechanismDamage to hands and fingers of riders.Proper outlined guide for Hand PlacementWear protection gloves133Tanvir M. Connor F. Erik L.
SafetyMotor failureLow resistance and Electrical overloadCorrosion of the motor shafts, bearings, and rotorsDetermine the full specifications for what type of motor we are looking forInvest in a High quality motor3927Deirdre A. Matthew G.
SafetyStability failureTrucks don't work as designedDanger to the rider of falling and hurting themselvesConduct tests of trucks over full range of speeds with differing loadsFind trucks that are stable3927Tanvir M. Connor F.
SafetyOverall integrity of collapsible partsWeak focal pointCollapsible mechanism does not have a long life span and the board is damaged after few usesDetermine the best and most applicable collapsible mechanism.Hinge system199Tanvir M. Connor F. Erik L.
ResourceLack of additional funding (Budget)Not keeping track of spendingUnable to finish design or a low quality productProper documentation of spendingCut costs where necessary339Deirdre A.
ResourceCustomer manufacturer quality and accuracy riskBad quality deliverLow quality productMake sure to order from reputable manufacturers.Change suppliers199All
ResourceLack of experienced riders to test prototypes or data collectionLack of exposure to longboard ridingLack of essential knowledge on the design of the longboardHave a team meeting for instruction on how to ride the longboardInterview experienced riders111Erik L.

Team Plan

Over the next few weeks, we will finalize the set of deliverables, keeping an open line of communication with customer so that we can adapt to any changes in customer expectations. Research will be conducted by each member on their assigned project subsystems: motors, pressure sensors, batteries, folding mechanism, etc. Following this, after identifying the impacts any specific component of a subsystem may have with the other systems, initial design of subsystems will commence. A visual representation for the Michelin Design competition will be created by mid February.

Individual Plans

Table 8: Individual Tasks Table


Task #1Task #2Task #3
Connor FordStart deck design concept.Begin designing/testing force couple system.Integrate force couple system into concept deck design.
Deirdre ArcandResearch options for collapsible mechanism design concept, identify ideal mechanism.Communicate with Erik, Tanvir, and Connor on design ideas and considerations for deck and collapsible mechanism.Outline in detail sub-team deliverable items and deadlines, identify and practice a means of tracking/communicating objectives throughout MSD team.
Erik LydickResearch options for collapsible mechanism design concept, identify ideal mechanism.Communicate with Deirdre, Tanvir, and Connor on design ideas and considerations for deck and collapsible mechanism.Compile renderings and sketches and oversee submission of project for the Michelin Competition before March 1st.
Kristin OstiguyOrganize research on batteries and power supply, narrow down top choices.Assist with learning information about custom made pressure plates, how they will work for our purposes.Outline all electrical components and how they will be integrated in order to prep for ECAD design and PCB layout
Matthew GouldFinish motor research and offer final choice for motorsCreate a test stand for FSR control system and run initial tests to determine feasibility and get in touch with FSR manufacturer and determine viability of chosen applicationsGet motor data sheets or determine setup that will allow experimental determination of motor parameters in order to facilitate accurate motor modeling in Simulink.
Tanvir MajlishStart deck design concept.Begin designing/testing force couple system.Integrate force couple system into concept deck design.

Deirdre Arcand's plan

Connor Ford's Plan

Matthew Gould's plan

Erik Lydick's plan

Tanvir Majlish's plan

Kristin Ostiguy's plan

Relevant Files



  • Aucune étiquette