Document Owner: Jeffrey Seamon

Date Updated: 10/28/2020

Date

Monday 10/26/2020 - 11:15 am to 12:15 pm - Zoom Meeting

Pre-Read

Since our System Level Design Review, we have started to meet more in person to gain a better understanding of our inventory and what work the previous teams have done. The focus of our design remains a semi-autonomous player piano device capable of assisting a human pianist in playing a piece, with a user interface, full autonomous support, among other requirements.

Over the course of this meeting, we will be going through the topics listed in the agenda above. This will begin with a review of the project definition, including customer and engineering requirements, and our progress in the design process to this point. Each team member will then talk more in depth about the subsystem or process that they have focused their efforts on in this phase, including any work they have done with feasibility, schematics, and/or prototyping. We will then review our current bill of materials and any items we will be looking to purchase at this point. Next up will be our continued work on developing process flowcharts and assessing risks associated with this project. Finally, we will update you on out project schedule and review our plans for the next phase

If you would like to review the work we have completed during this phase, feel free to follow this link to the Preliminary Detailed Design page in Confluence:

https://wiki.rit.edu/display/P21363/Preliminary+Detailed+Design

Attendees

  • Nick Besley
  • David Anthony
  • Josiah Martuscello
  • Steven Petrick
  • Jeffrey Seamon
  • Jerry Adamski (Guide)
  • Ron Dufort (Customer)

Goals

  • Review project definition and our progress to this point
  • Discuss the work done by each team member toward their designated subsystem
  • Discuss current BOM and proposed additions
  • Revisit risk assessment
  • Show our tentative upcoming schedule
  • Discuss next steps, answer questions, ask for approval

Agenda and discussion notes

TimeItemWhoNotes
5 min Background/Review of ProjectSteven PetrickN/A
5 min Sustain Pedal DesignJosiah Martuscello

Current design/actuator won't work for other pedals; expensive to purchase more actuators; consider feedback button to stop actuator from moving past a certain point; make sure feedback works both autonomously and with a human; document possibility for actuation of other pedals

5 min Solenoid Extender DesignJeffrey SeamonO-rings are (relatively) easy to replace, not a permanent fixture
5 min Solenoid System DesignDavid AnthonyCalculating power required by hand (not simulated); it's doable to use household power supply
5 min Feedback System DesignNick Besley

Microphone: dynamics, record to MIDI; Buttons: real time, show missed keys; ensure feedback across all functions; keep in mind that microphones may require phantom power

5 min Server/Frontend DesignSteven PetrickN/A
5 min Bill of MaterialsDavid AnthonyRon likes "dream piano" concept, include that when talking about BOM
5 min Risk AssessmentJosiah MartuscelloN/A
5 min Plans for Next PhaseNick BesleyN/A
5 min Thank you, Questions, ApprovalNick BesleyHave a consistent plan to cover each subsystem, include bullets of "what to do" after each

Presentation

The following link leads to the presentation given for the review: Preliminary Detailed Design Review Presentation. A PDF version is also available here.

Issues Raised

  • Presentation included too much info for a gate review, but was good for now
  • Discuss calibration more

Decisions Made

  • Approval given ("March On") to proceed to Detail Design Phase

Action items

  • Team will complete peer evaluations
  • Ron will make contact with with Catherine Lewis (director of DSO) for possible collaboration
  • Team will also follow up with Catherine Lewis